Question: Criminalisation of protection seekers in Greece

In order to deter, Greece sentences those seeking protection to long prison terms – covered by the Commission, which refuses to intervene and does not declare itself competent. For example, Hanad Abdi Mohammad was sentenced to a total of 142 years' imprisonment for taking the wheel of a boat and saved 31 people in the process. With other Members, I have asked whether the EU Commission will ensure that Greece complies with international law and will intervene here. This question was not answered by the Commission, white means that the Commission does not intend to do anything.

My complete question on the situation in Greece and the Commission's reply can be found here. here:

My request

Subject: Criminalisation of migrants in Greece

On June 25, 2021, the New York Times published an article titled "He Saved 31 People at Sea. Then Got a 142-Year Prison Sentence." It describes how Hanad Abdi Mohammad took the helm of a boat carrying 33 people who were trying to get to Greece from Turkey and made it to safety. He was then sentenced to 142 years imprisonment for people smuggling, of which he has to serve 20 years, the maximum sentence allowed under the Greek penal code.

The newspaper article points out that asylum seekers who take the wheel after smugglers have left a boat are increasingly being found guilty and sentenced by a court for the purpose of deterrence and intimidation. The non-governmental organisation Border Monitoring has identified at least 48 cases of this kind in Chios and Lesvos alone. Add to this the criminalisation of irregular entry in 2020, when dozens of migrants were sentenced to prison terms at the Greek-Turkish land border instead of being taken to reception centres to establish their identity. Guilty verdicts against refugees as smugglers violate EU asylum rules, according to which refugees are granted the right to apply for asylum.

How will the Commission ensure that Greece complies with EU and international law in such cases?

Answer given by Ylva Johansson on behalf of the European Commission on 18.10.2021:

The facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence is covered by the Smuggling Directive.[1]. Under the Treaties, it is the national authorities, not the Commission, that are responsible for investigating and prosecuting cases of people smuggling.

In the Commission Guidelines on the implementation of the Smuggling Directive[2] clarify that Member States may waive sanctions if the purpose of the activity is to provide humanitarian assistance. Furthermore, the guidelines clarify that legally required humanitarian assistance should never be criminalised. The Commission will continue to be in close contact with Member States' authorities to gather information on the implementation of the smuggling package and, where appropriate, to launch infringement procedures in case of breaches of EU law.[3] It will also report on the implementation of the smuggling package, including the above-mentioned guidelines, in the context of the implementation of the new EU Anti-Smuggling Action Plan (2021-2025).

The Asylum Procedures Directive[4] provides that Member States may not detain a person solely because he or she has applied for international protection. Detained persons should be informed of the possibility to apply for international protection. Furthermore, Member States must provide detainees with timely access to the asylum procedure in accordance with Article18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.


[1] Directive2002/90/EC (OJ L328, 5.12.2002, p.17).

[2] C(2020)6470 of 23 September 2020.

[3] Communication from the Commission "EU law: better outcomes through better implementation" (C(2016)8600, OJ C18, 19.1.2017, p.10).

[4] Directive2013/32/EU (OJ L180, 29.6.2013, p.60).

News from Afghanistan

Due to the current developments in Afghanistan, by mid-October 2021, in addition to the „News from the Borders“ has prepared a daily press review on the most important events in the country itself, but also on the people who are trying to flee from there.

10/14/2021: I talk to T-Online and Watson about the Kabul airlift and the current situation in Afghanistan +++ Commemoration is no substitute for coming to terms with the past +++ A gay man tells of threats from the Taliban

  • In an interview with T-Online I said that it was right to thank the soldiers of the Bundeswehr for their deployment. But I also warn against forgetting the vulnerable people in Afghanistan now that the mission is over.
  • I was allowed to talk to Watson about ithow we are currently working on the Kabul airlift, and why the international community must become more involved in Afghanistan and not repeat its old mistakes.  
  • With the Taliban coming to power, the LGBTQ community in Afghanistan is living in fear. A 25-year-old gay man from Afghanistan explains that the Taliban openly threaten to throw gay men off tall buildings. You can watch the 80-second video at RND.

13.10.2021: Great taps in Berlin +++ Bremen:in demand country admission +++ EU wants to support Afghanistan with one billion € 

  • The EU announced at the G-20 summit, she would support Afghanistan with one billion euros. Merkel reiterated that Germany would provide 600 million euros to support the people of Afghanistan. It was stressed that the money is not a form of recognition of the Taliban.

12.10.2021: Alliance of researchers calls for more threatened Afghan women to be admitted +++ G20 special summit +++ Joe Biden's interpreter manages to escape 

  • Joe Biden's former interpreter, Aman Chalili, managed to escape from Afghanistan by land – after a desperate call for help. In 2008, he was part of a small strike force that rescued Biden and his companions after their helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing in remote territory because of a snowstorm. Chalili's family had tried in vain to flee Kabul on an evacuation flight after the Taliban took power.
  • The economy has collapsed, every third person suffers from hunger and many people are on the run. Now, energy expert Alias Wardak explains.that the power supply, and thus the infrastructure, could also collapse (paywall). 

11.10.2021: Art project aims to help Afghan family reach Europe +++ Former local forces live in fear of Taliban +++ Private airline banned from flying to Pakistan 

  • Masoud Azami was a local worker in Afghanistan. He has been hiding in Kabul for weeks, afraid for himself and his children.  The taz tells his story.
  • Numerous people have been killed in an attack in Kunduz province. A report with the background can be found at tagesschau.de.
  • Despite great dangers, women in Afghanistan do not want to give up their dream of an equal life. How women insist on their rights, t-online has written down here.

08.10.2021: Bamf exerts pressure on Afghans to be put in a worse position +++ Female judges go into hiding +++ 200 local staff are flown out 

  • Afghan local workers and their families are admitted to Germany via section 22 of the Residence Act. Apparently, however, the Bamf is putting pressure on the people to apply for asylum anyway, which would leave them in a worse position. A video was leaked to Pro-Asyl, you'll find it here.
  • In view of the scheduled review process, the opposition has criticized Defense Minister Kramp-Karrenbauer's plans. Read more about the background on n-tv.

7.10.2021: Kabul airlift evacuates 13 people +++ 300 people could be flown out of Kabul by charter flight +++ Resettlement Forum in Brussels 

  • Yesterday, the Kabul air bridge was able to pick up eleven German citizens and two people with German residence permits from #Afghanistan evacuate to Pakistan, including 9 children. They were brought to Islamabad with a chartered plane and will be flown on to Frankfurt from there. 

I also report regularly on Kabul airlift on Twitter 

  • Today the High Level EU Resettlement Forum on Afghanistan took place in Brussels. At the invitation of Commissioner Ylva Johansson, decision-makers from the European Union are meeting to discuss admissions from Afghanistan. Amnesty International has made clear demands to the conference, you can find them here.
  • Under the rule of the Taliban, the mood in the capital Kabul has also changed drastically. What it feels like to live in the city is described by the former deputy director of the news channel TOLONews. You can find the article in Newsweek (English).

6.10.2021: Taliban murder members of the Hazara minority +++ Taliban want to issue passports again +++ Humanitarian cash payments are not yet recognition of the Taliban

  • The Taliban have given a Report of the human rights organization Amnesty International The Taliban have committed a war crime in the killing of 13 members of the Hazara minority. In the Afghan province of Daikundi, nine security forces of the deposed Afghan government were executed without trial by Taliban fighters, despite having surrendered. 

5.10.2021: Taliban summon former local forces to court and threaten them +++ Interior Ministry continues to delay taking in vulnerable people +++ German Afghanistan mission cost €17.3 billion 

  • In an open letter, NGOs had asked the Ministry of the Interior for help for threatened Afghans. The response: a collection of text modules. The Ministry of the Interior, led by Seehofer, is obviously not very interested in saving people. taz reports.  

4.10.2021: Local forces threatened with homelessness in Germany +++ Attack in front of mosque in Kabul +++ Kramp-Karrenbauer receives rejection from almost all parliamentary groups

  • The police station in police district number 10, in Kabul. „This police station was financed with public money from the Federal Republic of Germany“, is written in German in capital letters on a sign. However, the Taliban police officers here cannot say anything more about this, the station was built about 18 years ago, when most of them were still children. tagesschau.de was on patrol with the Taliban police.
  • In a remote mountainous region, the Taliban's rule has dramatic consequences: The most powerful ethnic group, the Pashtuns, are taking homes from their Shiite neighbors. It could be a harbinger of ethnic cleansing. Der Spiegel was on the scene (paywall).

10/1/2021: Taliban break up protest of six women with warning shots +++ Greek government closes off to Afghans +++ Taliban abolish press freedom 

  • The Taliban are abolishing freedom of the press. At a meeting with journalists in Kabul in late September, the Taliban's Ministry of Information and Culture distributed media regulations whose provisions are so broad and vague that they effectively ban any critical reporting on the Taliban.

30.09.2021: German authorities delay family reunification +++ G20 countries plan special gig +++ German Foreign Office now to evacuate local forces via Pakistan 

  • German authorities delay and prevent according to research by Panorama the right to family reunification of refugees. In this country alone, according to the Foreign Office, more than 4000 people from Afghanistan have been on the waiting list for an appointment for up to two years in order to be able to submit their documents at all. Because of the filibustering, they are now under Taliban rule. 
  • The pictures from Kabul have been gloomy since the Taliban came to power, even if something like everyday life is back. Life in Afghanistan is changing.Zeit Online has put together 16 current photos from Afghanistan that you can look at. watch here can

09/29/2021Taliban rule increasingly Islamist and misogynistic +++ DW journalist arrives in Germany +++ Luxembourg grants protection status to almost all Afghan asylum seekers 

  • For some Afghan business owners, flight is out of the question because they don't want to leave their female employees alone with the Taliban. The taz reports.

Sep 28, 2021: Kabul airlift continues to work to save people +++ Ghani distances himself from pro-Taliban Facebook post +++ International court does not investigate US soldiers 

27.09.2021: Taliban call for resumption of international flights in Kabul +++ Washington Post analyzes why security force buildup failed +++ The last Jew leaves Kabul 

  • Building Afghanistan's national security forces has been one of the most ambitious and expensive projects in the two decades that NATO has been active in Afghanistan. The Washington Post analyzes why this project failed and the country fell to the Taliban with almost no military resistance. 
  • The "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan", which the Taliban proclaimed once again, was never abolished from their point of view. And the Taliban had never completely lost support among the population either. In this 19-minute feature, the Deutschlandfunk attempts to to explain where the support for the Taliban in parts of the population comes from

09/24/2021: Taliban want to reintroduce executions and hand amputations +++ German Foreign Office continues not to communicate with relatives of people left behind in Afghanistan +++ Hunger in refugee camps

  • Two children in Germany continue to wait for their mother to finally be allowed to leave the country. But so far they have only received automated answers from the Foreign Office. WDR reports.

23.09.2021: "Cologne Declaration" criticizes EU refugees +++ 30 documented cases of pushbacks on Balkan route in August +++ Mounted U.S. Border Patrol agents chase refugees from Haiti

  • The green member of the Bundestag Margarete Bause writes in an Guest article for the Frankfurter Rundschauthat one in three people in Afghanistan is starving and that the country urgently needs help. Furthermore, the EU and Germany also have an obligation to show solidarity and must not shirk their responsibility to continue taking in refugees.
  • Fawzia Saidzada has been fighting for women's rights in Afghanistan for years. Now her enemies are in power. Her place of residence is being watched, one of her brothers has already been beaten up. The Süddeutsche Zeitung visited them in Kabul.

22.09.2021: Taliban push for UN recognition +++ Taliban still not accepting women into interim government +++ Desperation of local forces left behind grows

21.09.2021: Man deported to Afghanistan killed +++ Federal government continues to delay rescue and doesn't even know how many local forces need rescuing +++ Study proves: Taliban have not become more "moderate" 

20.09.2021: Taliban exclude girls from higher education +++ Journalist:s ask international community for help +++ Rescue of local forces continues to be delayed

  • The Taliban have excluded girls and women from secondary schools. A statement on the upcoming start of school stresses that only male teachers and students should return to secondary school classes. Time Online reports.

17.09.2021: Dissent podcast on Kabul airlift +++ EU Parliament calls for rapid resumption of evacuations from Afghanistan +++ Annalena Baerbock calls for consistent halt to deportations to Afghanistan

  • We MEPs have voted by a large majority in favour of resuming evacuations from Afghanistan as soon as possible. Deutschlandfunk reports. You can read the text adopted by Parliament read here.
  • Annalena Baerbock spoke out yesterday in favour of a consistent stop to deportations to Afghanistan. She said: "The deportations to Afghanistan must be stopped and suspended. People who live here cannot be in the uncertainty [...] that they fear that at some point they will have to go to a country where the Taliban are in the government. That's why I'm in favour of a consistent ban on deportations; You can watch the whole ZDF show Klartext here.
  • Due to several cases of measles, the US government is not allowing people flown out of Afghanistan to enter the country at Ramstein for the time being. Medical personnel at the Ramstein base have now begun vaccinating thousands. Spiegel Online reports.

16.09.2021: Afghan banks run out of money +++ EU Commission provides additional €100 million for Afghanistan +++ People report how their evacuation is delayed and prevented

  • For two weeks, a thousand people have been stuck in the northern Afghan city of Mazar-i-Sharif, although several planes are waiting for them to leave. They are failing due to bureaucracy - while the fear of the Taliban is growing. Der Spiegel spoke to one of them (paywall).
  • For seven years, Wahid was on duty for the German Armed Forces and was considered one of the best translators. Now he fears for his life and won't leave his house. Although he was already at the airport, they just didn't want to save him. Spiegel TV visited him and shot this 5-minute film with him.
  • Disguised in burqas, Afghan women footballers from the national U teams smuggle themselves into Pakistan at the risk of their lives. Other plans were previously foiled by a bomb explosion. Sports lessons for women and girls have already been banned by the Taliban in Afghanistan. ntv reports on their escape.

15.09.2021: German government continues to delay the rescue of people +++ Thousands demonstrate against the Taliban in Kandahar +++ EU foreign policy chief wants to talk to the Taliban 

  • I spoke to T-Online about the Kabul airlift. And also about how the German government made false promises and dragged out the rescue of people. Six people who were on Foreign Office lists are already dead, several have been kidnapped or have been served death sentences. 
  • In the European Commission's draft action plan on the Taliban takeover, it was elaborated that an agreement to facilitate deportations to Afghanistan would be suspended. However, the action plan encourages the continued deportation of Afghans from EU countries to third countries. Statewatch took a closer look at the draft action plan here.

14.09.2021: UN pledges $1.2 billion for Afghanistan +++ Interior Ministry puts 2600 people on its lists +++ Afghan women protest against forced veiling

  • At the first UN donor conference after the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan a total of 1.2 billion US dollars has been pledged for humanitarian purposes. The sum includes emergency aid for the suffering population as well as development aid and support for neighbouring countries that are taking in refugees. The Federal Government is contributing the equivalent of 100 million euros to the emergency aid.

13.09.2021: UN warns of economic collapse +++ Universities introduce strict gender segregation +++ Thousands of Afghan refugees wait in Ramstein for onward travel to the USA 

  • A 16-year-old from Berlin wants to get his family out of Afghanistan. But without a recognized refugee status, he, like most other Afghan refugees in Germany, has no right to bring his family here – even though he is a minor. The RBB visited him and describes the situation.

10.09.2021: Six people killed on German evacuation lists +++ Plane takes 110 people from Kabul to Doha +++ Greens call for rescue of Afghan journalists  

  • At least six people on German evacuation lists have been executed in Afghanistan. People have been practically prevented from being rescued, although it has been publicly claimed that they should be evacuated. I was talking to Watson about it.

EU Commission supports Croatia's Schengen accession despite pushback

On 15 June, together with eleven other Members from three political groups. wrote this letter to inspector Ylva Johanssonin which we call on the Commission to take immediate action against the pushbacks and human rights violations by Croatia at the EU's external border. The letter was prompted by Media reports from Spiegel, ARD, Lifhthouse Reports and Novostiwhich show that even children, pregnant women and people with disabilities are brutally pushed.

This broad Europe-wide network of journalists published new reports of pushbacks by Croatian border guards, in six cases specifically documented with videos. Entire families and vulnerable people are being pushed back across the EU border through the forest. One case involves a pregnant woman in her eighth month with five small children. The six videos show a total of around 65 people, including 20 children, being illegally pushed. Among them even a man with a heart condition and crutches.

In the letter we criticize that the impression is created that the Commission and the Council want to convey to the public that human rights violations are to be prevented, but in practice member states of the European Union can simply do what they want and the Commission looks on.

Commission's reply

In her reply, Ms Johansson writesthat it expects the Croatian authorities to take the reports seriously and investigate them. This is welcome, but in the past such calls have also been largely ignored by the Croatian side and the practice of pushbacks has continued. Ms Johansson draws attention to the fact that Croatia has agreed to a new monitoring mechanism at the border, which will also include the Red Cross and other organisations.

The problem is that the visits of the organizations are announced in advance. This is like the police announcing a day before a house search that they now want to search the house and then being surprised when nothing suspicious is found in the apartment. In this form, the monitoring mechanism is neither independent, nor will it serve its purpose. Despite the obvious human rights violations and the breach of the Schengen Border Code, the Commission is maintaining its recommendation that Croatia be admitted as a member of the Schengen area.

To support the surveillance mechanism, the Commission has pledged €14.4 million to the Croatian Ministry of Interior. The project financed by this grant agreement will last until May 2022 and is expected to further strengthen border surveillance, according to the Commission.

Question: Readmissions between Turkey and Greece

Greece rejects asylum applications from people seeking protection and issues exit orders to Turkey. However, Turkey has not allowed any readmissions for over a year now – people have to leave, but cannot. This leads to a situation „of eternal refugees“ who live in Greece in miserable conditions because they no longer receive benefits.

I asked the EU Commissionwhether this practice is compatible with EU law. In its reply, the Commission statesthat the practice of denying benefits is contrary to European law. Now, at long last, the Greek Government must also comply with the EU directive and, therefore, with applicable law. Unfortunately, however, we currently have a situation both in the camps and at the external borders in which the Greek Government is obviously breaking the law and getting away with it.


You can find my complete question and the Commission's answer here:

My request

Subject: Readmissions between Greece and Turkey

Although Turkey has not allowed readmissions since March 2020, the Greek authorities issue decisions on the voluntary departure of Syrian nationals whose applications have been rejected as inadmissible in a final decision (Turkey is considered a "safe third country" for them). These individuals must leave Greece within 10, 15 or 30 days, although their applications have not been examined on their merits. However, they are not allowed to enter Turkey and cannot return to Syria due to the ongoing conflict. This has led to a situation of "perpetual refugees". At the same time, they no longer have access to material benefits granted under the reception scheme and are exposed to precarious living conditions against the backdrop of a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece, which has led to severe exit restrictions.

(1) Is that practice compatible with Article 38(4) of Directive 2013/32/EU?

2. is it compatible with Articles 13 and 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Articles 4 and 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

3. whether the expulsion of such persons and their exclusion from material reception conditions is compatible with Article 3 of the ECHR and Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

Answer given by Ylva Johansson on behalf of the European Commission on 01.06.2021

The Commission is aware of the increasing number of Syrian nationals on the Greek islands whose asylum applications have been finally rejected by the Greek Asylum Service, following the fact that Turkey has been declared a safe third country under the EU-Turkey Declaration.[1] was declared inadmissible.

Turkey suspended returns from Greece in March2020 in the context of COVID-19 restrictions, and although Greece and the Commission have repeatedly called for returns to resume in accordance with the EU-Turkey Statement, Turkey has not yet complied with this request.

In Article 38(4) of the Asylum Procedures Directive[2] states that 'where the third country does not allow the applicant to enter its territory, Member States must ensure that access to an [asylum] procedure is granted'. In line with this provision, applicants whose application has been declared inadmissible may therefore reapply[3]. When re-examining and deciding on these applications, Greece must take into account the circumstances at the time of the (re-)examination of each application, including with regard to the prospects of return in accordance with the EU-Turkey Statement. In the meantime, applicants shall have access to material reception conditions in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, EU law and national law.[4].

The Commission is in close contact with the Greek authorities on the issue raised by the Honourable Member. The EU remains committed to the full implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement, which is the main framework for cooperation between the EU and Turkey on migration issues. This partnership is based on mutual trust and action, which requires commitment and continuous efforts from all sides.


[1] See https://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/

[2] See Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection. (OJ L180, 29.6.2013, p.60).

[3] See Joined Cases C-924/19PPU and C-925/19PPU, paragraph175ff.

[4] See Directive2013/33/EU.

Refugees in Greece receive money from the EU through this programme

In order to support the protection seekers on the Greek islands, the UNHCR has set up a Cash Assistance Programme. Under this scheme, a fixed monthly amount is transferred to an account for the protection seekers, which they can then dispose of freely. 

In principle, the Cash Assistance Programme is intended to offer people seeking protection the opportunity to organise their basic needs according to their individual requirements. It is intended to give them a degree of autonomy in a situation in which they are otherwise unable to shape their own living conditions. At the same time, an attempt is made to build up relationships with the population, to make it easier for them to settle in and to support the local economy. 

It is not comparable to an income or social assistance, to which there is a legal entitlement, but is intended to support people in shaping their own opportunities to provide for themselves. 

Who gets money? 

To determine who is entitled to the payment, the Greek government, together with the European Union Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid, agreed on a list of criteria: 

  • Arrived in Greece after 1 January 2015 
  • Registered by the Greek authorities and residing in Greece
  • Provisional or completed registration by the determining authority
  • Official document issued by the Greek Government confirming their identity and residence status.
  • Over 18 years old 
  • Living in camps or other accommodation (protection seekers in private accommodation are excluded) 
  • Not employed by an NGO or UN agency
  • Not employed and without income 

How will the money be distributed?

The money, 99.80% of which comes from the European Union, is distributed by a consortium called the Greece Cash Alliance (GCA) in cooperation with the Greek Ministry of Migration Policy. The GCA consists of the UNHCR, Catholic Relief Services, International Rescue Committee, Mercy Corps, International Federation of the Red Cross and Samaritan's Purse. 

The people who are supported receive a "UNHCR Greece Cash Alliance Card", which works like any other giro card in Greece. This means that money can be withdrawn as well as paid with the card in the shops. The cards only work in Greece and will be permanently deactivated if attempted to be used outside. Those seeking protection are required to regularly certify their presence in the country and their current eligibility to one of the GCA partners.

How long will those seeking protection be supported? 

There is no minimum or maximum period. Protection seekers are supported until they no longer meet the requirements. This means that the protection seekers are actually always only safe until the next appointment with the GCA partner that it continues. Of course, it is possible to change the requirements and this also leads to the fact that money is no longer paid out to certain persons. It is also possible that the amount of money will change. Here it is unclear on what benchmarks the amount is measured and on what basis who determines changes. Currently in Greece, for example, the number of meals received in the camps is deducted from the monthly amounts. 

How much and where does the money come from? 

A total of €83 779 826.13 was distributed in 2020. Broken down to February 2021, 64 726 people in Greece received Cash Assistance, with a total of 37245 cards in circulation. This makes a total amount of almost €7.3 million for February 2021. 

Currently, the amounts are so high: 

Amount in places where regular meals are provided 

Single person over 18 90€
Couple, parent and child140€
family of 3190€
family of 4240€
family of 5290€
family of 6310€
Family of 7 or more330€

Amount in places where regular meals are not provided 

Single person over 18 150€
Couple, parent and child280€
family of 3340€
family of 4400€
family of 5450€
family of 6500€
Family of 7 or more550€

Question on the involvement of Frontex in illegal pushbacks

Together with other MEPs, I put the following questions to the EU Commission, which answered them on 14.04.2021:

Subject: Alleged involvement of Frontex in illegal refoulement of asylum seekers

On 23 October 2020, Der Spiegel published its investigation entitled "Frontex implicated in illegal pushbacks of refugees". At the LIBE Committee meeting of 6 July 2020, Fabrice Leggeri denied any knowledge of pushbacks by the Greek authorities, except for one incident, which he described as a "misunderstanding". In contrast, however, the article reveals that Frontex officials were aware of at least six incidents in which the Greek authorities had carried out refoulements without helping migrants in distress, and despite the fact that officials were obliged by the Code of Conduct for Frontex Officials to prevent refoulements. This includes an incident that took place on 8 June 2020, in which Frontex vessel MAI 1103 blocked a migrant boat, deliberately created dangerous waves to stop the boat's forward movement, and left the site after Greek authorities had arrived and pushed the boat back.

1. what measures the Commission and Frontex are considering to ensure that the above incidents do not recur?

2. whether the Commission knows whether Fabrice Leggeri was in fact unaware of the above incidents when he appeared before the LIBE Committee?

3. in the light of the above, what view does the Commission take of the political responsibility which Frontex must bear as a result of the incidents?

Answer given by Ylva Johansson on behalf of the European Commission on 14.04.2021:

The Commission takes the allegations of refoulement very seriously. In line with EU law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the principle of non-refoulement must be upheld in border management.

In order to discuss the allegations, the Commission asked the Management Board of Frontex to hold two ordinary Management Board meetings in November 2020 and January 2021, in addition to two extraordinary Management Board meetings. These were convened on 10 November 2020, 9 December 2020 and 5 March 2021.

At its meeting of 10 November 2020, the Board decided to set up a dedicated working group to conduct further investigations into this matter in accordance with the allocation of responsibilities set out in Regulation (EU)2019/1896.[1] The Commission was represented in this working group and submitted a number of questions to the Executive Director in order to obtain further clarification. Upon invitation, a representative of the European Parliament also participated in the relevant meetings of the Management Board.

The Executive Director of Frontex informed the Commission by letter of 27 October 2020 of the preliminary findings of the internal investigations into the incidents reported in the media. He stressed that Frontex had so far not found any documents or other material to substantiate the allegations of violations of fundamental rights or of the Frontex Code of Conduct by seconded officials. The final report of the working group and the conclusions adopted by the Management Board on 5 March 2021 were published on the Agency's website.[2]

An effective and well-functioning Agency for the management of external borders, which guarantees the protection of fundamental rights in the exercise of its functions, is one of the Commission's priorities. To this end, the Commission will continue to support and advise Frontex to ensure the effective fulfilment of the Agency's mandate.


[1] Regulation(EU)2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard (OJ L295, 14.11.2019, p.1).

[2] https://frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/management-board-updates/conclusions-of-the-management-board-s-meeting-on-5-march-2021-on-the-report-of-its-working-group-on-fundamental-rights-and-legal-operational-aspects-of-operations-in-the-aegean-sea-aFewSI

Newsletter: What was important last month

20/01 January in the European Parliament

Herewith you get my monthly review, with the following categories: The "News from the Borders" give you an update on the situation at the external borders, "Asylum and migration in Parliament" gives an insight into what is happening in my focus area in Parliament, and "What else is important" takes a look at other topics that are important to me. In addition, there is at the end "Good News".

News from the Borders

Situation in Greece and Bosnia-Herzegovina worsens 

The situation in the camps at the Greek external borders is getting worse and worse. Repeatedly the new Moria was flooded due to heavy rains, it is cold and strong winds made life in the tents even more difficult. Meanwhile, in Bosnia, thousands of people are trying not to freeze to death in the snow and sub-zero temperatures. The burned down Lipa camp is considered uninhabitable despite new tents.

How the current situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina could come about and what needs to be done now, I have explained in a Post on my homepage and in the current episode of my podcast "Thick Board" discussed. 

At least 127 people died trying to reach Europe in January 

105 people drowned in the Mediterranean, 22 while trying to reach the Canary Islands from the African mainland. Despite the many deaths, civilian sea rescuers continue to be prevented from doing their work.

You can find out more about the accidents on the project page "Missing Migrants" of the IOM and in this Article in the Frankfurter Rundschau.  

My daily newsletter on Telegram 

If you want to learn more about the current situation at the European external borders, you can my daily newsletter on Telegram Subscribe. 

Asylum and migration in Parliament 

Frontex 

A Frontex working group of the European Parliament will investigate the scandals surrounding the European border management agency Frontex. As we have been calling for months, the working group will look into the allegations of illegal "pushbacks" against refugees. This is an important step on the road to the rule of law at the European external borders. The serious allegations of human rights violations at the EU's external borders must be clarified. Furthermore Frontex ceases its activities in Hungary. The reason for this is that Hungary continues to illegally deport people to Serbia despite the ECJ ruling and Frontex would thus be complicit in breaking EU law. 

Plenary debate on the humanitarian situation at the external borders

In my speech, I drew attention to the EU's complicity in the untenable conditions for refugees in Bosnia-Herzegovina. (DE) Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, having discussed this issue time and time again in the European Parliament, we must now see action. The full plenary debate on the humanitarian situation of refugees can be found here in the European Parliament Media Centre. For the theme you must enter below on the time display between 11:45 and 13:01. 

My report on asylum procedures at the EU's external borders

At the first meeting of the Home Affairs Committee this year, a broad majority my own-initiative report on the implementation of asylum procedures at the EU's external borders adopted. This ability to compromise on the part of Parliament leads me to look forward to good cooperation in future negotiations on the dossiers. of the Asylum and Migration Pact hope.

What else is important 

European Parliament calls for immediate halt to construction of Nord Stream 2

Following the arrest of the Russian opposition activist Nawalny, the EU Parliament has joined with a large majority in our call for a halt to the construction of Nord Stream 2. The German MEPs in our group voted unanimously against the Baltic Sea pipeline. That Russian natural gas is simply no longer needed in Europe, shows, among other things, this study by the DIW.

European immunisation strategy

Together with other Members, I have co-signed a letter to the Commission and the Council calling for a solidarity-based distribution of vaccines worldwide and, in this context, also pointing out the EU's responsibility towards economically less strong regions. For we can only overcome this pandemic if we combat the virus globally.. You can find the letter on the homepage of my group colleague Reinhard Bütikofer. 

Good News of the month 

A French baker successfully defends himself against the deportation of his apprentice 

With a hunger strike and a wave of solidarity, the French Stéphane Ravacley prevents the deportation of his apprentice to Guinea. Newspapers in this country are also reporting on the case, which is making waves in France. 

From now on you can get’s monthly review as a newsletter directly in your mailbox. For this you can subscribe register here

Interim assessment of the German Council Presidency

We MEPs from the Green Group on Europe have drawn up an interim balance sheet and are now providing a Overview of the different topics. On asylum and migration issues, Germany has blocked a lot and achieved little during this period, and the crises at the external borders have worsened during the German Council Presidency. Here are the assessments of my areas of work at a glance:


Mass camps for refugees at EU external borders

After the Fire in Moria there was no coordinated redistribution of refugees. The homeless people were shipped to a new Moria on an old shooting range, where living conditions are even worse. The German Council Presidency has failed to work towards distribution and an end to the mass camps at the EU's external borders.


Green Position: The Greens have called for the immediate evacuation and redistribution of refugees from Moria.

Common European Asylum System

The work on the asylum and migration pact is only in its infancy, but there is reason to fear a deterioration of European asylum law. The German government is in favour of mass processing of asylum seekers under detention-like conditions in future border procedures.


Green Position: This creates more morias instead of preventing them. Protection seekers must be redistributed from the external borders as quickly as possible and given fast, fair procedures based on the rule of law. We have also set out our proposals for a fair and efficient asylum system in Europe in this position paper set out.

Asylum and Migration Fund:


In the ongoing trilogue negotiations with the Council of Ministers on the asylum and migration fund, the German Council Presidency is opposed to direct EU funding for municipalities willing to receive asylum seekers.


Green position: Municipalities that want to take in people should be able to help and be supported. Solidarity should be promoted through financial incentives.

Development cooperation instruments:


In the discussions on the largest foreign policy and development cooperation instrument of the next seven-year EU budget - the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) - the German Presidency managed to reach a good compromise with the European Parliament on new development cooperation funds. By introducing human rights guarantees, the fund will hopefully be able to leverage private investment while ensuring, among other things, the safety of workers in the implementation of projects.

EU-Africa


2020 is an important year for EU-Africa relations. The German government had announced before the start of its presidency that it would make Africa a focus of its work. However, due to the pandemic as well as a lack of creative planning to look for alternative solutions, consultation with civil society in partner countries was not successful, while important decisions were taken in developing a joint strategy for the European and African Union.


Green position: The implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris climate targets should be financed not only with public but also with private funds. Binding human rights and sustainability criteria as well as transparency and sufficient control mechanisms are essential when awarding and implementing investments in developing countries. Harmful exports of electronic waste or skimmed milk powder with vegetable fats have been flooding the African market for years - to the detriment of local production, the environment and health.

Question: Human rights violations by Greek authorities

In order to be able to exercise my parliamentary control function as a Member of the European Parliament, I have the opportunity to put questions to the European Commission. The Commission must answer these questions.
Together with other Members, I put the following questions to the Commission:

Subject: Systematic and coordinated push-backs by the Greek authorities

On August 17, 2020, the New York Times published an article titled "Taking Hard Line, Greece Turns Back Migrants by Abandoning Them at Sea." It documents how migrants who landed on Greek soil were repeatedly forced by Greek officials onto unsafe life rafts and abandoned at the sea border between Turkey and Greece. There they were left to drift until rescued by the Turkish coast guard. Others were towed back to the Turkish maritime border and left there after officials disabled their engines, abandoned on an uninhabited island or expelled across the Evros River without the possibility of appeal.

Is the Commission aware of these incidents and can it confirm that they are taking place?

Given the seriousness of the newspaper, we believe that the Greek authorities are carrying out unprecedented, extremely aggressive and systematic push-backs, in breach of Union law, in particular Article78(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Articles 3 and 4 of the EU Schengen Borders Code, Article9 of the Asylum Procedures Directive, Article5 of the Return Directive, Articles18, 19(2) and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees. Asylum and migration are shared responsibilities of the Union. In view of this, does the Commission intend to initiate infringement proceedings against the Greek Government?

Answer given by Commissioner Ylva Johansson on behalf of the European Commission on 06/11/2020:

The Commission is following the situation closely and has taken note of reports such as those quoted by the Honourable Members.

It has expressed concerns to the Greek authorities about these reports and stressed that, for border surveillance tasks under Regulation (EU)2016/399 on the Schengen Borders Code, Member States should[1] are responsible. In doing so, obligations related to fundamental rights, ensuring access to international protection and the principle of non-refoulement under Union and international law must be fully respected.

Without prejudice to the Commission's powers as guardian of the Treaties, the national authorities are primarily responsible for the correct transposition and application of EU law. The Commission has therefore urged the Greek authorities to investigate any possible wrongdoing.

With the new migration and asylum package[2] - in particular the proposal for a Regulation introducing screening of third-country nationals at the external borders[3] - the Commission has suggested that Member States, with the assistance of the Fundamental Rights Agency, establish an independent monitoring mechanism. This would ensure compliance with EU and international law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, during the screening process. At the same time, it would ensure that any violations of fundamental rights, including those related to access to the asylum procedure and non-compliance with the principle of non-refoulement, are effectively and promptly investigated.


[1] Regulation (EU2016/399 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) OJ L77, 23.3.2016.

[2] COM(2020)609final of 23 September 2020.

[3] COM(2020)612final of 23 September 2020.

Question: How is the EU tackling incitement on the net?

In order to be able to exercise my parliamentary control function as a Member of the European Parliament, I have the opportunity to put questions to the European Commission. The Commission must answer these questions.
Together with other Members, I put the following questions to the Commission:

Question with priority for written answer P-004488/2020 to the Commission

Subject: The Commission's efforts to tackle the spread of racism, hatred and incitement on major technology platforms such as Facebook.

Recent reports indicate that Facebook is not effective enough in combating racism, hate, and hate speech [1]. Facebook does not officially recognise itself as a news media company and is therefore not obliged to comply with journalistic standards. Its commitment to combating hate, agitation and racism is therefore voluntary. In addition, Facebook's unwillingness to take action against hate and incitement has led to an advertising boycott by more than 400 brands [2].

1.    How does the Commission ensure that major technology companies such as Facebook adhere to standards that minimise, prevent and reduce the spread of hate and incitement and racist ideologies on their platforms?

2.    What are the findings of the annual monitoring of Facebook in relation to the EU Code of Conduct on Combating Illegal Hate on the Internet and how would the Commission assess the effectiveness of the Code given Facebook's reluctance to tackle hate, hate speech and racism?

3.    How does the Commission intend to effectively monitor, assess and curb the spread of hate, agitation and racism on online platforms such as Facebook?


[1]     https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebooks-artificial-intelligence-doesnt-eliminate-objectionable-content-report-finds-11594287000

[2]     https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/01/facebook-frustrates-advertisers-as-boycott-over-hate-speech-kicks-off.html

Answer given by Commissioner Didier Reynders on behalf of the European Commission on 03.11.2020:

To counter the spread of illegal hate online, the Commission agreed in 2016 with a number of IT companies, including Facebook, on an EU Code of Conduct[1]. The code of conduct includes an obligation to review users' reports within 24 hours and, if necessary, to remove the content concerned. It also encourages cooperation with civil society organisations and national authorities.

The Commission regularly monitors the implementation of the Code of Conduct[2]. As the latest ratings show, on average, IT companies review 90% of the messages within 24 hours and remove 71% of the hate content. While Facebook deleted only 28% of such content in2016 , its removal rate has now improved to over 80%.

However, the Code of Conduct has not only brought about progress in eliminating illegal hate comments, but has also fostered synergies between businesses, civil society and Member State authorities. The results achieved with the Code of Conduct will be taken into account in the ongoing reflection on the Digital Services Bill.[3] include. The proposed Digital Services Act aims to harmonise and clarify the roles and responsibilities of online platforms in combating illegal content transmitted through their services, including illegal internet hate speech. These new rules will also adequately protect fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including freedom of expression online.


[1] https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/eu-code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en

[2] The results of the latest round of assessments were published on 22 June 2020 and are available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/eu-code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en.

[3] The Digital Services Act was announced in the Commission's Communication on "Shaping Europe's Digital Future", https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-shaping-europes-digital-future-feb2020_en_4.pdf

EN